Yamaha CP50 User Manual Page 3

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 5
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 2
THE
VIEW FR()M THE
GTG
Three heavy
hitters in
the
keyboard world
put
the three CP
pianos
through their
paces.
Here's what
they
had
to say:
Michael
Ghegan on the CPSO
Justin
Timberlake, Pat
McGhee Band,
Cirque
du Soleil
I
michaelghegan.com
Controls:
I like the sensible navigation of
controls,
and the
general
ease
of
patch
nav-
igation, effects,
and editing on
the fly.
Keyboard
feel: This keyboard is a
tank.
It's solid under the
fingers and has a bit of
a
hard touch, but it's
great
for the meat-and-
potatoes
rock
gig.
Acoustic
pianos:
They cut through a
mix
very well. I like to
EO them a little to
get
the
midrange
right.
Electric
pianos:
I love the
Rhodes-like
pianos.
They have the
per{ect
amount of bell
tone and
attack, and are
warm with very
nice imaging.
The Wurly is also a very
good
sound, but
needs a bit of
EO.
Sumi"ty,
The CP50
is
a
very
good
key-
board
for the
weekend warrior,
rehearsal
space, and
home studio.
I found it to be a
very strong all-around
'board
for
a
working
bluesirock
player.
The
tonal
palette
is diverse
and covers
a lot of
ground.
The key action
has heft and
will withstand a
good
hand ham-
mering. lt's
nice to see a
quality
instrument
that can take a
beating and keep on
rolling!
lonathan Hamby on
the
CP5
Carrie
Underwood, Amy Grant,
Peter
Cetera
I
keytracks.net
Gontrols: I like that each voice and effect
section
has
a button to toggle
it on
and off
instantly-great for changing on the fly.
Keyboard
feel: lt's
a bit different
than
other
digital
pianos
I've used, but
I really
like
it.
The
parts
I
play
on this
piano
are more like
what
I would
play
on
a real
piano
than
any
other digital
piano
I've
tried.
Acoustic
pianos:
They're
well
done
from
top to bottom. On the CFlllS,
each regis-
ter
has its own character
without
getting
lost or overshadowing
other ranges like on
some
digital
pianos.
The
56
has its
own
character
as well, which is a
nice
alterna-
tive in certain situations.
Electric
pianos;
The Rhodes sounds are
really
great,
especially
with the
phaser
and
chorus
effects. Go start a Steely
Dan cover
bandl
The CPSO
[electric
grand]
is
also
really
well done.
Summary:
The CPS is
probably
better
suited
to
gigging
than the CP1 because
it
has a bigger
sound set. lt also
works
well
as
a writing or
practice
keyboard because
you
can record
performances
for
playback
as WAV
files to a
thumb
drive,
which is very
handy.
The CP5 has worked
really well for
me in
live situations.
$col{
Healy on the
GPI
Conan on TBS
I
bluedogmusic.com
Controls:
Everything is right
there
in front
of
you.
Changing
patches
and banks
is
a snap,
and saving
presets
is
painless.
The screen is
bright, and on the CP1
you
have some really
useful
parameters,
such as hammer hardness,
which lfind myself using the most.
Keyboard
feel:
The weighting feels natu-
ral, not too heavy, like a light to medium
Yamaha
grand.
lt is, I believe, the most real-
istic feel
of all
the digital
pianos
I've
played.
Acoustic
pianos:
The
overtones don't build
up
in an unnatural way as they do on so
many sampled
keyboards. The
pedaling
is
realistic, and ihe
imaging in headphones is
amazing. lt sounds
great
loud,
and cuts
through the band.
li
sounds
great
soft-the
mid octaves
are
warm
and rich. There's
no
perceptible
looping or cross-fading.
Electric
pianos:
The Rhodes sounds are
decent, a
little
quieter
than I'd like, but the
onboard
effects
really
add
punch.
The Wurly
is
good,
but the
growl
and bark sounds a
bit unnaiural to
me, especially compared to
other keyboards out
there, like the Nord.
their Peter Gabriel
glory. My ears say they're a
dead ringer
for
the origi-
nal
black
beast with
its
unmistakable
trapezoid-shaped
harp.
The CPl, CP5,
and CP50 all offer
a
good
variety ofEP
Voices
(13,
nine, and five,
respectively), with the CPl
adding authentic
DX7-style
pianos created by
a real FM tone
generator. Adjustable settings
for these
"DXEP"
sounds
include decay and release times,
attack and
release
tonal
character, and oscillator detune.
There's no operator
programming, though,
so
dont expect to
find
a
full DX7 lurking under
the hood. On the CP5
and CP50, DX
pianos
are
sample-based.
Yamaha's SCM seems tailor
made for killer
EP
simulations.
Nearly
3A
KEYBOARDMAG,COM
O3,2O11
Summary:
I've
used
it
onstage
in front of
15,000
people,
in
clubs
for
'1
5
people,
on
records, and
in my
studio.
lt
sounds
great
through
a stereo
P.A.
and through a
good
amp
in mono. I
play
it on the Conan show
on TBS, and
for recording sessions. I also
just
played
the CP5 alajazz
gig,
as well as
onstage
with
Jack
White. I
think
the CPs
are the best digital
pianos
out there, and
I've
played
them all.
I now
endorse
Yamaha,
but
it was because
I liked
the CP1
so much
that
this happened.
every
pro
I invited to
play
the
CP series raved about the
quality and real-
ism of the electric
pianos. As with
the
acoustic
piano
sounds, there's a
slight
loss in
detail
and dynamic range as
you migrate from the CPl to
the CP5 to the CP50, but
make no mistake-every one
of these retro
patches will bring the utmost
in vintage credibility to
your gig.
Piano
Details
Yamaha's goal of modeling the
nearly infinite array of variables that
make
up a
real piano's
sound
was met with
flying
colors
here. On the CPl, six
knobs
let you
alter
characteristics such as
hammer hardness, damper
Page view 2
1 2 3 4 5

Comments to this Manuals

No comments