Yamaha SW1000XG Specifications Page 20

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 59
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 19
127 Question: Will the VST mixer send out sysex to the SW1000XGs hardware mixer then?
Answer: No, it runs to its own internal system, and consequently if used with the SW1000XG,
can negate some of the benefits gained by having a hardware mixer device. To mix the audio in
VST, the best way is to use the mixer maps provided by Yamaha, or make your own up. Using
sysex/MIDI ccs to control the volume/panning etc and just use the VST mixer for channel audio
eq if desired.VST4.0 has a more comprehensive approach.
128 Question: Will the SW1000XG work in the new VST24 version 4.0? (currently June 98 in
Beta)?
Answer: Yes (PC at first).
129 Question: Does this apply to Cakewalk 7.0 as well?
Answer: Yes, Yamaha have provided a fully comprehensive Studioware panel which controls
the SW1000XG at hardware level, so please use this (or possibly your own adaptation of this)
to control the audio levels.
130 Question: In applications like SAW and Cool edit pro, the internal mixers that they utilize
(with things such as volume envelopes etc) won’t be accessed via the SW1000XG as none of
them respond to sysex data. The same applies to ACID by Sonic foundry. So how can I
automate my mix with these apps?
Answer: Good one this. The best way is to use the SW mixer in XGEDIT, run the output of
this to the input of a basic sequencer or MIDI file player that is sync locked up to Cool Edit or
SAW. Placing the sequencer into record mode, record the mixes as MIDI events whilst the
audio is playing in cool edit or whatever app. This allows you to then fully automate your mix
without ever touching the audio or using CPU cycles for dynamic mixing. When you have your
final fully dynamic mix in place, you can then select another track in cool edit etc and record the
whole lot down as a stereo pair using the SW1000XG internal loopback system. A separate
stand alone app that could manage all of this would be ideal, and ideas along this tack have
been put forward for planning.
131 Question: What about audio profiler settings in Cakewalk?
Answer: Just run the hardware profiler in Cakewalk, and let it do its stuff on the multiple wave
outs of the card. The Wave Profiler in Cakewalk will test all six of the wave outs on the card and
then provide settings which it feels are best suited to your machine configuration.
132 Question: Can I assign the multiple wave outs to separate outputs in applications such as
Cool Edit Pro, and SAWPLUS?
Answer: Yes, This allows you to bypass the mixers in the applications and use the hardware
mixer on the SW1000XG if you so wish also. Please remember that an application that can
record MIDI also will enable you to automate your mixes. An example of this is the use of the
Cubase Mixer Map system, which can bypass the audio mixer in VST and control the
SW1000XG at a hardware (less CPU intensive) level.
133 Question: In the application ACID by Sonic Foundry, you can mix multiple tracks and use the
mixer functions and pan functions within this app; do the SW1000XG hardware mixer and
panning controls free up more power for the CPU to perform the other tasks that ACID is good
at?
Answer: Yes, you will need to run a sequencer alongside it though, or alternately, you could
harass the team at Sonic Foundry into building support for the SW1000XG into ACID, to free up
some CPU cycles (same goes for Cool Edit Pro and SAW).
134 Question: Is this true of all audio applications, will the hardware mixer and effects really free
up that much CPU?
Page view 19
1 2 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 58 59

Comments to this Manuals

No comments